Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Asia Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Asia
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Asia
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Asia Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,042,790 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,051,974 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 0.77%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Asia |
Minimum | 2.8% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 52.5% |
Range | 29.4% | 49.8% |
Mean | 16.0% | 16.2% |
Median | 16.3% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Asia by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Japan (16.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Inupiat (16.9%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Irish (16.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Palestinian (16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (16.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Northern European (16.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Irish | 98.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Paraguayans | 98.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Palestinians | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 97.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Canadians | 97.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Albanians | 97.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |