Guatemalan vs Malaysian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Malaysian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Guatemalans
Malaysians
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Malaysian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,997,178 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,907,967 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
![Guatemalan vs Malaysian Self-Care Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/self-care-disability/guatemalans-vs-malaysians-self-care-disability-chart.webp)
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Malaysian |
Minimum | 0.26% | 0.090% |
Maximum | 5.6% | 9.5% |
Range | 5.3% | 9.4% |
Mean | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Median | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.73% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.92% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.91% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Malaysians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Chinese (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (2.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Osage (2.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Spaniard (2.6%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Central American (2.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Panamanian (2.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Native Hawaiian (2.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Samoan (2.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and Ecuadorian (2.6%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |
Spaniards | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.6% |
French Canadians | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.6% |
Osage | 3.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.6% |
Iraqis | 3.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.6% |
Chinese | 2.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 2.7 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.6% |
Guatemalans | 2.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.6% |