Dutch vs Immigrants from Ghana Vision Disability
COMPARE
Dutch
Immigrants from Ghana
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Dutch
Immigrants from Ghana
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
17.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
8.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs Immigrants from Ghana Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 552,767,412 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,859,756 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dutch | Immigrants from Ghana |
Minimum | 0.42% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 19.4% | 6.4% |
Range | 19.0% | 6.0% |
Mean | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch and Immigrants from Ghana by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Samoan (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Bermudan (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Indonesian (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (2.2%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
Barbadians | 5.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.3% |
Portuguese | 4.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.3% |