Dutch vs Immigrants from Uruguay Vision Disability
COMPARE
Dutch
Immigrants from Uruguay
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Dutch
Immigrants from Uruguay
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
17.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
11.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs Immigrants from Uruguay Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 552,767,412 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,246,833 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.586 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.70%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dutch | Immigrants from Uruguay |
Minimum | 0.42% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 19.4% | 4.2% |
Range | 19.0% | 2.8% |
Mean | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.89% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 0.72% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 0.69% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch and Immigrants from Uruguay by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Samoan (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Brazil (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nigeria (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%), German (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Indonesian (2.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |