Chinese vs Ecuadorian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Ecuadorian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Chinese
Ecuadorians
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
2.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Ecuadorian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,436,326 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.421 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 0.57%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 0.55% | 0.65% |
Maximum | 8.0% | 3.5% |
Range | 7.4% | 2.9% |
Mean | 2.8% | 2.3% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.82% | 0.89% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 0.64% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 0.63% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Ecuadorians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guatemalan (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Osage (2.6%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), White/Caucasian (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Celtic (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Samoan (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |
Spaniards | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.6% |
French Canadians | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.6% |
Osage | 3.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.6% |
Iraqis | 3.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.6% |
Chinese | 2.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 2.7 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.6% |
Guatemalans | 2.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.6% |