Celtic vs Chinese Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
Chinese
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Celtics
Chinese
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
4.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
2.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Chinese Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,804,948 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.916 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 0.49%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.75% | 0.55% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 8.0% |
Range | 49.3% | 7.4% |
Mean | 4.6% | 2.8% |
Median | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 3.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 0.82% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Chinese by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Scotch-Irish (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Ecuadorian (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guatemalan (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |
Spaniards | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.6% |
French Canadians | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.6% |
Osage | 3.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.6% |
Iraqis | 3.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.6% |
Chinese | 2.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 2.7 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.6% |
Guatemalans | 2.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 2.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 2.6% |