Alaska Native vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Carpatho Rusyn
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alaska Natives
Carpatho Rusyns
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
29.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,753,099 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,605 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.33%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaska Native | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 15.1% | 19.6% |
Range | 13.8% | 19.0% |
Mean | 6.5% | 7.2% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives and Carpatho Rusyns by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are European (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), British (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |