Afghan vs Immigrants from China Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Afghan
Immigrants from China
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Afghans
Immigrants from China
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Immigrants from China Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,854,459 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,848,702 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 3.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.43% | 0.61% |
| Maximum | 9.8% | 12.9% |
| Range | 9.3% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 5.1% |
| Median | 5.3% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Immigrants from China by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Australia (5.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Turkey (5.4%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |