Afghan vs Indian (Asian) Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Afghan
Indian (Asian)
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Afghans
Indians (Asian)
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Indian (Asian) Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,854,459 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,002,853 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Afghan | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 0.43% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 9.8% | 12.9% |
Range | 9.3% | 12.4% |
Mean | 5.5% | 5.2% |
Median | 5.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 5.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Indians (Asian) by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Australia (5.5%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |