Latvian vs Greek No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Latvian
Greek
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Latvians
Greeks
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
92.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Greek No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,382,965 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 480,584,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 3.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Greek |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 1.00% |
| Maximum | 28.8% | 20.3% |
| Range | 28.3% | 19.3% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 7.4% |
| Median | 5.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Greeks by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.97%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Puget Sound Salish (9.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Costa Rican (9.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Chippewa (9.4%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |