Immigrants from Uruguay vs Scottish No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Scottish
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Scottish
11.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Scottish No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,161,139 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,431,251 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.702 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 76.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Scottish |
Minimum | 2.7% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 19.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 17.2% | 97.0% |
Mean | 9.7% | 12.6% |
Median | 9.5% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 9.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 17.5% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Honduran (12.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Egyptian (11.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Liberian (12.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Serbia (11.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Black/African American (11.9%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.0 /100 | #247 | Tragic 11.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 1.9 /100 | #248 | Tragic 11.8% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #249 | Tragic 11.8% |
Paiute | 1.8 /100 | #250 | Tragic 11.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 1.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 1.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 11.9% |
Egyptians | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Swedish (6.8%, a difference of 0.47%), Scotch-Irish (6.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Dutch (6.8%, a difference of 1.2%), German (6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and Czech (6.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |