Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Luxembourger 2 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,289,317 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.541 and weighted average of 59.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,657,746 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529 and weighted average of 59.1%, a difference of 0.90%.

2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Eastern Asia	Luxembourger
Minimum	46.9%	46.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	53.1%	54.0%
Mean	65.6%	71.7%
Median	64.5%	69.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	60.4%	65.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.0%	79.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.6%	13.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.2%	11.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.1%	11.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Luxembourgers by 2 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Taiwan (59.7%, a difference of 0.25%), French (59.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Czechoslovakian (59.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Malaysian (59.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and Northern European (59.9%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bhutanese (59.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (59.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Afghan (59.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Celtic (59.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Spaniard (59.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	2 or more Vehicles in Household
Cherokee	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 59.9%
Northern Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 59.9%
Malaysians	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 59.8%
Czechoslovakians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 59.8%
French	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 59.8%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 59.7%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 59.6%
Yaqui	99.9 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 59.3%
Immigrants \| India	99.9 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 59.3%
Belgians	99.9 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 59.3%
Choctaw	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 59.3%
Spaniards	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 59.2%
Immigrants \| Laos	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 59.2%
Celtics	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 59.2%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 59.1%
Luxembourgers	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 59.1%
Chickasaw	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 59.0%
Afghans	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 59.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 58.9%
Spanish Americans	99.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 58.9%
French Canadians	99.8 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 58.9%