Immigrants from South Africa vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Sudanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Sudanese
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,945,081 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.620 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,072,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 0.49%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Sudanese |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 86.7% |
Range | 98.5% | 86.3% |
Mean | 9.7% | 10.6% |
Median | 5.7% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.2% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.9% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Sudanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |