Immigrants from the Azores vs Costa Rican No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Costa Rican
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Costa Ricans
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Costa Rican No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,204,339 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,314,745 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 1.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 23.2% | 17.8% |
Range | 22.1% | 16.7% |
Mean | 8.3% | 7.0% |
Median | 7.4% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 9.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores and Costa Ricans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Puget Sound Salish (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Blackfeet (9.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |