Immigrants from the Azores vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Bahamian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Bahamians
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,204,339 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,549,845 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Bahamian |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 23.2% | 21.9% |
Range | 22.1% | 20.5% |
Mean | 8.3% | 9.3% |
Median | 7.4% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores and Bahamians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |