Syrian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
COMPARE
Syrian
Immigrants from China
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Syrians
Immigrants from China
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
77.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,191,069 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,493,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.26%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Syrian | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 13.4% | 8.2% |
| Range | 13.0% | 6.6% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.1% |
| Median | 4.8% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians and Immigrants from China by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Italy (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Palestinians | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 83.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.4 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 66.7 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 66.6 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
| Laotians | 66.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |