Osage vs Immigrants from China Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Osage
Immigrants from China
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Osage
Immigrants from China
5.3%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
42.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Immigrants from China Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,677,196 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,688,998 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 19.8% | 10.0% |
| Range | 17.6% | 6.6% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 5.3% |
| Median | 6.0% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Immigrants from China by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Oceania (5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Peru (5.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Poland (5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Iraq (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Iran (5.3%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Afghan (5.3%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Indonesians | 71.2 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 71.0 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 70.6 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 65.9 /100 | #162 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 65.7 /100 | #163 | Good 5.2% |
| Afghans | 62.0 /100 | #164 | Good 5.3% |
| South Americans | 60.6 /100 | #165 | Good 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 60.2 /100 | #166 | Good 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 57.7 /100 | #168 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 54.1 /100 | #170 | Average 5.3% |
| Peruvians | 51.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 50.7 /100 | #173 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 48.1 /100 | #175 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 44.6 /100 | #177 | Average 5.3% |
| Osage | 42.5 /100 | #178 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 40.8 /100 | #179 | Average 5.3% |