Immigrants from Lithuania vs Egyptian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Egyptian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Egyptians
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Egyptian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,604,968 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.711 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,383,478 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 5.0%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Egyptian |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 22.1% | 9.8% |
| Range | 19.7% | 8.6% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 4.7% |
| Median | 4.4% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Icelander (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Bhutanese (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Canada (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Cambodians | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |