Immigrants from Eritrea vs Egyptian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eritrea
Egyptian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Eritrea
Egyptians
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eritrea vs Egyptian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,834,311 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,383,478 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.65%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eritrea | Egyptian |
| Minimum | 0.30% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 9.8% |
| Range | 13.8% | 8.6% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 4.7% |
| Median | 5.1% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eritrea and Egyptians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eritrea are Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |