Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Chickasaw
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,623,871 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.90% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 13.8% | 20.0% |
| Range | 12.9% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 6.1% |
| Median | 4.9% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Basques | 86.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 86.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |