Immigrants from Cuba vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Chickasaw
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,054,081 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.283 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 5.0%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 10.7% | 20.0% |
| Range | 9.6% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Cambodian (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (4.9%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Moldova (4.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Austrians | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Okinawans | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |