Danish vs Zimbabwean Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Danish
Zimbabwean
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Danes
Zimbabweans
4.5%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Zimbabwean Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,242,434 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,161,381 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 6.3%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 44.4% | 10.2% |
Range | 43.1% | 8.4% |
Mean | 6.5% | 4.6% |
Median | 4.3% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Zimbabweans by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Venezuelan (4.5%, a difference of 0.45%), Czech (4.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Luxembourger (4.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Thai (4.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and Cuban (4.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Carpatho Rusyn (4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pennsylvania German (4.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
English | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.8% |