Chinese vs Osage Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Osage
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Comparison
Chinese
Osage
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.6%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Osage Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,562,312 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.255 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,939,113 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.563 and weighted average of 4.6%, a difference of 9.8%.
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Osage |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 11.9% | 9.2% |
Range | 10.9% | 8.8% |
Mean | 4.5% | 4.0% |
Median | 3.5% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Osage by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Hmong (4.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Fijian (4.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Sudanese (4.4%, a difference of 5.0%), Chickasaw (4.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and Immigrants from Cuba (4.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cuban (4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Menominee (4.6%, a difference of 0.54%), Lumbee (4.6%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (4.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and Creek (4.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Creek | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lebanese | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |