Bolivian vs Celtic Unemployment
COMPARE
Bolivian
Celtic
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Bolivians
Celtics
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Celtic Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,629,958 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,747,363 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Celtic |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 11.8% | 14.3% |
| Range | 9.8% | 13.9% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 5.5% |
| Median | 4.4% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Celtics by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Lithuanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Northern European (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Czechoslovakian (4.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Filipino (4.8%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Singapore (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and White/Caucasian (4.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| French Canadians | 99.3 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |