Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Australia Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,491,073 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,859,842 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 0.14%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac	Immigrants from Australia
Minimum	1.3%	3.4%
Maximum	20.8%	43.0%
Range	19.5%	39.6%
Mean	11.2%	13.7%
Median	11.2%	10.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.9%	8.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.7%	18.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.8%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.4%	8.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.3%	8.3%

Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and Immigrants from Australia by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Icelander (9.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Chickasaw (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Czechoslovakian (9.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Netherlands (9.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Yaqui (9.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Laos (9.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Czechoslovakian (9.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Kenyan (9.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (9.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Icelander (9.9%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Scottish	99.3 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 9.8%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.2 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 9.9%
Mongolians	99.1 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 9.9%
Bulgarians	99.1 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Croatia	99.0 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 9.9%
Celtics	98.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 9.9%
Bolivians	98.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 9.9%
Kenyans	98.7 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Laos	98.7 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	98.6 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 9.9%
Czechoslovakians	98.4 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 9.9%
Chickasaw	98.4 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 9.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.3 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 9.9%
Icelanders	98.3 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.2 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 9.9%
Yaqui	98.0 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 9.9%
Sri Lankans	98.0 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.0 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 9.9%
Latvians	97.9 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 9.9%
New Zealanders	97.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	97.5 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 10.0%