Zimbabwean vs Syrian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Syrian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Syrians
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
77.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Syrian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,980,540 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,504,378 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.816 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 10.6%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Syrian |
Minimum | 0.67% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 88.0% |
Range | 31.5% | 86.6% |
Mean | 12.0% | 17.2% |
Median | 10.6% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 20.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 14.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Israeli (15.9%, a difference of 0.16%), French (15.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |