Zimbabwean vs Polish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Polish
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Poles
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Polish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,980,540 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,182,984 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.10%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Polish |
Minimum | 0.67% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 31.5% | 97.1% |
Mean | 12.0% | 20.7% |
Median | 10.6% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 19.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 20.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 20.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Poles by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Belgium (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Serbia (14.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Soviet Union | 98.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |