Zimbabwean vs Slovak Family Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Slovak
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Slovaks
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Slovak Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,162,841 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 396,377,277 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
![Zimbabwean vs Slovak Family Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/family-poverty/zimbabweans-vs-slovaks-family-poverty-chart.webp)
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Slovak |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 15.3% | 28.9% |
Range | 14.0% | 27.1% |
Mean | 6.2% | 9.9% |
Median | 6.1% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 11.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Slovaks by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Korean (7.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch (7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Northern European (7.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Australian (7.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Immigrants from Poland (7.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Irish (7.9%, a difference of 0.20%), English (7.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Europe (7.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from North America (7.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Dutch | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |