Yup'ik vs Tohono O'odham Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Tohono O'odham
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Yup'ik
Tohono O'odham
25.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
31.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Tohono O'odham Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,851,220 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 25.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,583,448 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 31.6%, a difference of 22.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik | Tohono O'odham |
Minimum | 7.1% | 11.0% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.9% | 89.0% |
Mean | 30.5% | 46.3% |
Median | 25.0% | 37.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 26.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.9% | 60.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.8% | 34.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 26.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.3% | 25.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Tohono O'odham by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Sioux (25.6%, a difference of 0.93%), Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 2.1%), Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Lumbee (30.7%, a difference of 2.9%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 3.4%), Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 3.7%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 12.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |