Yakama vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Iroquois
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Iroquois
28.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,831,112 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 28.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 9.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Iroquois |
Minimum | 17.1% | 11.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 82.9% | 88.3% |
Mean | 42.1% | 41.3% |
Median | 38.2% | 32.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.8% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.2% | 46.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 23.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.2% | 25.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Iroquois by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.90%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and Apache (27.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |