Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Iroquois
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Iroquois
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Iroquois Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,698,377 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 44.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Iroquois |
Minimum | 2.0% | 11.7% |
Maximum | 35.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 33.8% | 88.3% |
Mean | 15.4% | 41.3% |
Median | 15.2% | 32.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 46.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 23.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 25.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 24.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |