White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Asia Female Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Immigrants from Asia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Immigrants from Asia
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Asia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,172,468 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 9.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Immigrants from Asia |
| Minimum | 10.3% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 33.9% | 66.7% |
| Range | 23.6% | 63.7% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 12.5% |
| Median | 16.5% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Indian (Asian) (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |