Welsh vs Tlingit-Haida Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Tlingit-Haida
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Tlingit-Haida
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Tlingit-Haida Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 518,114,778 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,624,230 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 16.3% |
| Range | 96.7% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 13.6% | 5.6% |
| Median | 6.3% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.5% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.3% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Tlingit-Haida by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Okinawan (4.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Australia (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |