Ugandan vs Spaniard Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
Spaniard
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
Spaniards
14.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
15.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Spaniard Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,995,237 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,063,734 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 0.56%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Spaniard |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 30.6% | 68.3% |
| Range | 29.3% | 65.9% |
| Mean | 13.6% | 20.4% |
| Median | 13.1% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Spaniards by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.84%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.89%), Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 0.84%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |