Ugandan vs Iraqi Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
Iraqi
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
Iraqis
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Iraqi Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,824,152 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 0.040%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Iraqi |
Minimum | 5.5% | 0.98% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 45.5% |
Range | 94.5% | 44.5% |
Mean | 23.7% | 21.3% |
Median | 20.0% | 20.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 22.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.5% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.2% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Iraqis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |