Turkish vs Okinawan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Okinawan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Turks
Okinawans
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Okinawan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,373,565 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 0.74%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Okinawan |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 67.9% | 39.6% |
| Range | 66.2% | 38.0% |
| Mean | 20.0% | 17.9% |
| Median | 16.6% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Okinawans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |