Turkish vs Macedonian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Macedonian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Turks
Macedonians
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Macedonian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,464,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Macedonian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 67.9% | 40.0% |
Range | 66.2% | 37.0% |
Mean | 20.0% | 17.9% |
Median | 16.6% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.5% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 21.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Macedonians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |