Turkish vs Immigrants from Cuba Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Cuba
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Cuba
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Cuba Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 295,328,231 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.82%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Cuba |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 62.2% | 41.8% |
| Range | 58.9% | 41.3% |
| Mean | 18.2% | 12.3% |
| Median | 13.8% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Cuba by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |