Tsimshian vs Israeli Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Israeli
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Tsimshian
Israelis
16.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
50.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
76.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Israeli Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,622,353 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,424,853 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 3.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Israeli |
Minimum | 9.9% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 36.4% | 34.4% |
Range | 26.5% | 31.5% |
Mean | 19.7% | 16.1% |
Median | 16.5% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 21.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Israelis by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Colombia (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (16.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.4%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 63.6 /100 | #166 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 55.4 /100 | #167 | Average 16.3% |
South Americans | 55.3 /100 | #168 | Average 16.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 53.6 /100 | #169 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.7 /100 | #170 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 51.3 /100 | #171 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Uruguayans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.4% |