Tsimshian vs Egyptian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Egyptian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Egyptians
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Egyptian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,615,751 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,693,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 0.21%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Egyptian |
Minimum | 4.5% | 11.6% |
Maximum | 41.7% | 52.0% |
Range | 37.1% | 40.4% |
Mean | 23.7% | 20.8% |
Median | 23.8% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Egyptians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |