Tlingit-Haida vs Choctaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Choctaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Choctaw
11.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Choctaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,517,751 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,568,106 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 46.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 43.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.0% | 95.0% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 30.9% |
| Median | 12.4% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 34.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 20.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 20.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Indonesia (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nepalese (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Paraguayan (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (11.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Nepalese | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Samoans | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Burmese | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.72%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Osage (16.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |