Thai vs Filipino Family Poverty
COMPARE
Thai
Filipino
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Thais
Filipinos
6.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Filipino Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,767,426 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.453 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,803,740 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 0.57%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Thai | Filipino |
Minimum | 0.91% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 11.5% | 12.3% |
Range | 10.6% | 10.4% |
Mean | 4.7% | 5.6% |
Median | 4.3% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Thais and Filipinos by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 2.8%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 0.61%), Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 3.6%), Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 6.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |