Swedish vs Lithuanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Lithuanian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Lithuanians
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Lithuanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,313,222 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,598,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 27.5% |
| Range | 63.3% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 13.6% | 11.1% |
| Median | 10.8% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Lithuanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.80%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |