Spanish American vs Central American Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American
Central American
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Spanish Americans
Central Americans
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American vs Central American Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,161,919 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,924,730 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American | Central American |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.6% | 98.8% |
Mean | 20.4% | 20.2% |
Median | 15.6% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 22.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish Americans and Central Americans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Bangladeshi (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |