Soviet Union vs Belgian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Belgian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Belgians
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Belgian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,449,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,775,724 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 1.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Belgian |
| Minimum | 0.56% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 26.3% | 25.9% |
| Range | 25.7% | 23.0% |
| Mean | 9.6% | 10.1% |
| Median | 9.2% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Belgians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and British (12.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |