Scottish vs Indian (Asian) Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scottish
Indian (Asian)
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Scottish
Indians (Asian)
21.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Indian (Asian) Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,834,351 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,253,971 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 21.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 26.6% |
| Range | 90.0% | 21.9% |
| Mean | 44.2% | 15.3% |
| Median | 32.2% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.7% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.2% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.6% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.5% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.3% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Barbadian (21.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (21.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Grenada (21.8%, a difference of 0.15%), English (21.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and German (21.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
| Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
| English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |