Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Micronesia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Immigrants from Micronesia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Immigrants from Micronesia
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Micronesia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,598,516 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 9.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 28.6% |
| Range | 97.4% | 23.0% |
| Mean | 19.2% | 15.2% |
| Median | 14.6% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.5% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 5.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are American (14.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |