Samoan vs Puget Sound Salish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Puget Sound Salish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Puget Sound Salish
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
76.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Puget Sound Salish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,791,038 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,841,624 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 0.33%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Puget Sound Salish |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 62.7% | 40.8% |
| Range | 58.7% | 32.2% |
| Mean | 23.3% | 20.9% |
| Median | 20.1% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Puget Sound Salish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |