Puget Sound Salish vs Chilean Male Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Chilean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Chileans
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
84.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Chilean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,147,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,512,426 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.070%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Chilean |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 23.8% | 36.4% |
| Range | 21.4% | 35.6% |
| Mean | 11.7% | 10.5% |
| Median | 10.1% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Chileans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Ukraine (10.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Peru (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |