Puerto Rican vs Navajo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Puerto Rican
Navajo
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Puerto Ricans
Navajo
32.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puerto Rican vs Navajo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,321,641 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718 and weighted average of 32.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,292,374 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 30.5%, a difference of 7.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Puerto Rican | Navajo |
Minimum | 11.1% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 88.9% | 98.2% |
Mean | 39.4% | 40.4% |
Median | 31.2% | 37.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.1% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.3% | 52.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.2% | 30.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.8% | 22.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 22.4% |
Demographics Similar to Puerto Ricans and Navajo by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Puerto Ricans are Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 3.4%), Lumbee (30.7%, a difference of 6.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 10.8%), Pima (28.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Lumbee (30.7%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 3.3%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 3.7%), Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and Hopi (27.9%, a difference of 9.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |